Page 1 of 1

Patent 5,278,189

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:36 pm
by KewlKat

Re: Patent 5,278,189

Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:27 am
by tjohnson_nb
KewlKat wrote:Sometimes I think it may have been better for me to have remained ignorant of the major lies and deceptions that the medical communities have perpetrated against humanity as it's been maddening trying to get the uninformed to give vitamin C a serious trial. All the commercials now for every drug under the sun that they are hawking on TV should also be banned like the tobacco commercials were. Folks don't have a chance with all the misinformation out there.


So true, it is very maddening. But I'm so glad we have the internet so at least now we can find out for ourselves if we are interested. Science progresses 1 death at a time. :wink:

Re: Patent 5,278,189

Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:23 pm
by ofonorow
Patents in and of themselves are not scientifically convincing. I interpret the Pauling/Rath patent as a way to secure their place in history when this truth is finally revealed, i.e. the way to help prevent medicine from stealing the idea and claiming they invented it. I believe it also prevents a drug company from patenting it and trying to keep it from the public.

Probably one of the reasons Pauling didn't go into more detail on the 1992 video was because they had applied for the patent, but it has not been issued.