Huggins does indeed remove the fillings in the order of the highest electric potential. This is plausible and understandable with some basic chemical / physical knowledge. It is no secret thing; any dentist can do this, if he wants. Probably you can measure it yourself with a simple voltmeter.
plausible - Appearing worthy of believe.
This does not make it fact or scientific knowledge thats proven. Of course the human body is electrically charged thats one of the reasons why you are typing out your response. I do agree that the Amalgam fillings have to go, as stated its a toxic metal. The electrolyte (saliva) breaks down the mercury on the surface of the fillings. A battery comes to my mind, lead is removed from the plates and becomes lead sulfate due to the acid. I also read that the first 5% of surface of your fillings after a time period has lost the toxicity due to the electrolyte removing it. Is the toxicity also leaching out through the roots of the teeth? Probably, like polluted water leaches through an aquifer. But to state that the fillings have to be removed in a particular order is like saying one must cut infected toenails in a particular order for the athletes foot cure to kill bacteria under the toe nails.
I have been reading this board for two plus years and this is the first time I read that the fillings must be removed in a particular order. I may have missed it but I don not remember ever reading that, until this thread went in the direction it has.
You may think that the topic drifted but I think that is healthy its called critiquing not bad mouthing. If you get a second opinion from your doctor. Any doctor worth his salt will condone it, if he doesn't get rid of him. Same goes here if a reader cannot challenge or question what he, she is reading then we should have a book burning session, pull the plug on the computer and sit in the dark.
