Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

The discussion of the Linus Pauling vitamin C/lysine invention for chronic scurvy

Moderator: ofonorow

freeform

Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#1  Post by freeform » Tue May 31, 2011 8:34 am

I've been taking 1500mg of Niaspan (w/out statin) My glucose levels have shot up and I stopped taking it, levels now back to normal. Also, I have just gone for a regular check up with the Optometrist - I'm now at risk for Glaucoma :evil: I've been thoroughly researching Niaspan and Niacin, various sites say if you have Glaucoma do not supplement with Niacin??? (I've been taking regular Niacin for the past week - Glucose levels going up again :evil: ) Like some others on the board with a cholesterol dilemma - I'm really pee'd off trying to increase my HDL, decrease Trigs................ Anybody got any suggestions? Please don't say a statin - that was out to kill me too :roll:

Here is a recent study on Niaspan - study was stopped when a small increase in ischemic stroke was noted among those taking Niaspan compared to those taking placebo and implications on Abbott and Biosciences.

http://www.pharmatimes.com/article/11-0 ... ulled.aspx

Abbott's Niaspan fails to prevent heart attacks, trial pulled
WORLD NEWS | MAY 27, 2011

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/05/ ... 88536.html

Excerpt : A week earlier a panel of health advisers said another Abbott drug, Trilipix, should be re-labeled to indicate that it failed to lower heart attacks in a study of diabetics. Trilipix is a fibrate, a drug that lowers blood fats called triglycerides while boosting "good cholesterol."

Cobraman
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 2:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#2  Post by Cobraman » Tue May 31, 2011 5:31 pm

Have you tried chromium or cinnamon w/ your niacin. It will better the efficiency of the insulin. Also any attempts to use fish oil or phosphorus(lecithin) to help glucose? The chromium and cinnamon are mainstream, fish oil and phosphorus are still under study.

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#3  Post by freeform » Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:02 am

Cobraman, I’ve ordered the book The Niacin Solution that you previously recommended and awaiting it’s arrival, thank you. Yeah, I take 2000mg Fish oil, 400ug chromium, 400mg ALA (divided doses) 3000mg Cinamon in a combination formula with 7200mg Ginger and Gingko 6000mg.

I stop the Niaspan and glucose levels go back to normal. I start regular Niacin and levels start escalating again. I’m also concerned to read about the possible Glaucoma interaction that you should not take more than 200mg if you have this condition. Does this mean that Niacin has the ability to damage the optic nerve?

That study was rather disturbing on a couple of levels. Niacin raises HDL so why has this not had any benefit in preventing heart attacks, or is that a Statin factor clicking in?

I did like Abbott’s quote “Abbott's head of global pharmaceutical clinical development, responded to the news by saying that "lipid disorders and cardiovascular disease are complex and varied”
Does this promote confidence that the pharmaceutical industry actually know anything about the cholesterol phenomenon, or is it just a load of expensive bollocks?

There is obviously a percentage of people like myself that are not tolerating mega dose B3 and experiencing adverse affects with possible serious consequences? I’m going to ere on the side of caution and cease taking it.

I suppose the only other option if this lipid disorder is a major player in CHD is to try and maintain HDL, LDL, VLDL and triglyceride levels through specific foods and exercise? Unless you or anyone else knows of another little gem?

Saw
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 2012
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#4  Post by Saw » Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:34 am

Unless you or anyone else knows of another little gem?




The effects of grapefruit pectin on patients at risk for coronary heart disease without altering diet or lifestyle.
Cerda JJ, Robbins FL, Burgin CW, Baumgartner TG, Rice RW.
SourceDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610.

Abstract
Dietary intake of cholesterol has been linked to coronary heart disease. The effect of grapefruit pectin (Citrus paradisi) on plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the low-density lipoprotein:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was studied. The study design was a 16-week double-blind, crossover (placebo or pectin) using 27 human volunteers screened to be at medium to high risk for coronary heart disease due to hypercholesterolemia. The study did not interfere with the subjects' current diet or lifestyle. Grapefruit pectin supplementation decreased plasma cholesterol 7.6%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 10.8%, and the low-density lipoprotein:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio 9.8%. The other plasma lipid fractions studied showed no significant differences. We conclude that a grapefruit pectin-supplemented diet, without change in lifestyle, can significantly reduce plasma cholesterol.


Note: grapefruit does have an effect on other medications
http://www.raysahelian.com/grapefruit.html
Even a Blind Squirrel makes his own vitamin C.

ofonorow
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 15854
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Lisle, IL
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#5  Post by ofonorow » Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:54 am


I suppose the only other option if this lipid disorder is a major player in CHD is to try and maintain HDL, LDL, VLDL and triglyceride levels through specific foods and exercise? Unless you or anyone else knows of another little gem?



I do not understand. Why are your trying to micro-manage cholesterol? What is your condition and what do you hope to gain? (If you want your total cholesterol around 180 mg/dl - take optimal vitamin C!)
Owen R. Fonorow
HeartCURE.Info
American Scientist's Invention Could Prevent 350,000 Heart Bypass Operations a year

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#6  Post by freeform » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:42 am

Owen, I take optimal vitamin C! Or does bowel tolerance not equal optimal anymore?

So, what you are saying is providing your total cholesterol is 180 (anyone for a game of darts?) it does not matter what makes up that figure or the lipid ratio? Please enlighten me.

My condition? Just your common CHD. if you are saying that the only thing to take is Vitamin C then there is nothing I can learn from or contribute to this forum.

Saw-thank you for that information.

Johnwen
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#7  Post by Johnwen » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:38 am

Lowering cholesterol only reduces the RISK of heart disease. Just like not walking across a street reduces your RISK of being hit by a car. However if you have to cross a street to get to your job so you can make money, so you can eat and live. So you have to Take the RISK. The same with your body and Cholesterol.
Cholesterol is needed by every aspect of your body, primarily in the muscles and the nerves and brain. In the circulatory system it is used to patch a wound or crack to prevent you from bleeding to death. Reducing cholesterol artificially places the body at risk of other problems but when the natural levels are reduced by the body itself it means the body is in a satisfied and healthy state and any excess amounts are not needed for repairs.
What the Pauling therapy does is to keep the circulatory system in a healthy state and preventing the wounds and cracks from happening in the first place and when there is a patched over area it sends the necessary nutrients to the area to heal the damage so the body can remove the patch which is no longer needed. This and the many other aspects of the body use these nutrients as well to keep the body in a healthy state.
So to gauge the effectiveness of the Pauling Therapy by looking at Manipulated figures of a cholesterol test is not going to give you the results you are looking for. Only when your body is in a healthy and satisfied state will these figures start to lower and this could take years to accomplish.
If a person has CHD and begins the Pauling therapy there will be some immediate results maybe not what they hoped for but their setting the ground work for the healing to begin. However if the person has had it for a number of years there will be a time period for the body to respond to the nutrients that are now present to aid in it’s healing process. Unlike drugs which are designed for fast relief of symptoms without curing the problem. Nutritional therapy’s give the body the ability to adjust, heal and cure what problem has been created within.
So to say, “your wasting your time on this forum!” is a call only you can make. To me I value the knowledge and understanding I have received here primarily from the different points of view and logic from those who participate in our discussions. To me knowledge is the key to life.
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is
research!

ofonorow
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 15854
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Lisle, IL
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#8  Post by ofonorow » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:03 am

freeform wrote:Owen, I take optimal vitamin C! Or does bowel tolerance not equal optimal anymore?


I think we have assumed that bowel tolerance is much closer to optimal than the RDA! However, it is no guarantee that everyone is getting what they need, even at bowel tolerance.

It is interesting - you can use your total cholesterol level to help determine whether your bowel tolerance vitamin C intake is optimal! e.g., If total cholesterol is above 180 mg/dl, and you are at bowel tolerance, you may require even more vitamin C. (In this case, we now recommend adding a liposomal form (e.g. Lypo-C) to overcome a low bowel tolerance.)


So, what you are saying is providing your total cholesterol is 180 (anyone for a game of darts?) it does not matter what makes up that figure or the lipid ratio? Please enlighten me.


In my lay opinion, no, it matters little what the ratios are. I believe that they have been contrived (studies contrived) to sell lipid lowering drugs. Johnwen may disagree.

I have been impressed with Ginter's well controlled experimental studies of Vitamin C and cholesterol which seem to indicate that a normal total cholesterol is 180 mg/dl. In my own case, after years of vitamin C, I had my cholesterol tested for life insurance reasons; it was 180 mg/dl and I take about 20,000 mg. I thought the number looked familiar - and checked HOW TO LIVE LONGER AND FEEL BETTER. Pauling reported the 180 mg/dl number in the book. Many people on high vitamin C have reported exactly the same result (which is a little weird considering biochemical individuality) and even the Manhattan Project physicist Jorgenson had the same experience (180 mg/dl) per his letter: http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/jorgensen.htm

The level of cholesterol in a persons blood varies inversely with the level of the ascorbic acid in the blood. When I learned of this I decided to perform an experiment on myself. My cholesterol level had been running at 240 units for several years. My doctor told me he could give me a drug to lower the cholesterol level but he was afraid of the damage that might be done by the drug. An experiment had been reported that a person's cholesterol level depended on the amount of white sugar ingested. With this information in mind, I decided to eliminate sucrose in my diet as much as I could in our culture while I arbitrarily set my intake of ascorbic acid at five gram per day. Much to my doctor's surprise, my cholesterol level fell from 240 units down to 180 units. I know of similar experiments with similar results. Also I have not had a cold since I have been taking the larger amount of ascorbic acid.



My condition? Just your common CHD. if you are saying that the only thing to take is Vitamin C then there is nothing I can learn from or contribute to this forum.
.


I don't follow. I simply asked a question (hoping to learn) what you hoped to accomplish by monitoring the cholesterol fractions? But yes, according to Pauling/Rath, Levy and others, vitamin C is by far the most important nutrient visa/vi CHD. I and others recommend many more supplements than vitamin C, See: http://www.practicingmedicinewithoutalicense.com/protocol/
Owen R. Fonorow
HeartCURE.Info
American Scientist's Invention Could Prevent 350,000 Heart Bypass Operations a year

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#9  Post by freeform » Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:28 am

I totally agree knowledge is key I learn much from this forum and the experience of others. I reacted to your post which prompted a retort with my frustration of conflicting information. Owen, I don't expect you to remember what everyone is taking supplement wise, or what books they have on their shelves - believe me I have yours, Linus Paulings feel better, Dr Sinatra & Dr Roberts reverse heart disease now my respect for ALL publications is immense.

Yeah, we can all get hit by a bus, and no doubt you will quite rightly recommend they take Vitamin C to recover. If we need to go down the road of analogy to explain the situation I think I get it by viewing Vitamin C as an ingredient in the foundation of a building and the skin, the insulation and U value however come from other contributing factors..... If the wrong muck is used to cement the bricks, there is the likely hood the structure is compromised - many factors can bring the house down.

I never viewed Niacin as a Statin, many people seem to obtain benefit in increasing their HDL with this Vitamin as did I. However, the side effects in some can be problematic and possibly cause other serious complications, and I thought this bit of information may be of interest to other members using it for HDL boost. If you are correct in your assumption that it doesn't matter what the ratio is, you just need it to be 180 then people are buying and taking high dose Niacin (with risk) for no reason. For a heart patient this is seriously bad news as my translation reads that the drug industry and the alternative therapy on the subject of cholesterol has not got a bloody clue and prescribing for it all the same.

My house is suffering a bit of subsidence now ...........

ofonorow
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 15854
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Lisle, IL
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#10  Post by ofonorow » Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:12 pm

If you are correct in your assumption that it doesn't matter what the ratio is, you just need it to be 180 then people are buying and taking high dose Niacin (with risk) for no reason. For a heart patient this is seriously bad news as my translation reads that the drug industry and the alternative therapy on the subject of cholesterol has not got a bloody clue and prescribing for it all the same.


Bingo.

Add statin cholesterol drugs to Niacin.

However, if I had hypercholesterolemia - very high genetically induced cholesterol, I would take Niacin before any statin drug!
Owen R. Fonorow
HeartCURE.Info
American Scientist's Invention Could Prevent 350,000 Heart Bypass Operations a year

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#11  Post by freeform » Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:41 pm

Bingo is good - we'll get a full house soon :lol:

My last total cholesterol reading was 6 I think that translates to 232 in US value. What do you classify as the high bracket?

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#12  Post by freeform » Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:39 am

Owen, Johnwen First off please accept my apologies for continuing this subject - I've got the bit between my teeth on this cholesterol malarky / bunkum and feel pressure that I should be actively forcing this biological action to perform in a direction that it currently does not want to go.

I've come across this link http://www.ravnskov.nu/cholesterol.htm

 1  Cholesterol is not a deadly poison, but a substance vital to the cells of all mammals. There are no such things as good or bad cholesterol, but mental stress, physical activity and change of body weight may influence the level of blood cholesterol. A high cholesterol is not dangerous by itself, but may reflect an unhealthy condition, or it may be totally innocent.

 2  A high blood cholesterol is said to promote atherosclerosis and thus also coronary heart disease. But many studies have shown that people whose blood cholesterol is low become just as atherosclerotic as people whose cholesterol is high.

 3  Your body produces three to four times more cholesterol than you eat. The production of cholesterol increases when you eat little cholesterol and decreases when you eat much. This explains why the ”prudent” diet cannot lower cholesterol more than on average a few per cent.

 4  There is no evidence that too much animal fat and cholesterol in the diet promotes atherosclerosis or heart attacks. For instance, more than twenty studies have shown that people who have had a heart attack haven't eaten more fat of any kind than other people, and degree of atherosclerosis at autopsy is unrelated with the diet.

 5  The only effective way to lower cholesterol is with drugs, but neither heart mortality or total mortality have been improved with drugs the effect of which is cholesterol-lowering only. On the contrary, these drugs are dangerous to your health and may shorten your life.

 6  The new cholesterol-lowering drugs, the statins, do prevent cardio-vascular disease, but this is due to other mechanisms than cholesterol-lowering. Unfortunately, they also stimulate cancer in rodents, disturb the functions of the muscles, the heart and the brain and pregnant women taking statins may give birth to children with malformations more severe than those seen after thalidomide.

 7  Many of these facts have been presented in scientific journals and books for decades but are rarely told to the public by the proponents of the diet-heart idea. 

 8  The reason why laymen, doctors and most scientists have been misled is because opposing and disagreeing results are systematically ignored or misquoted in the scientific press.  

 9 The Benefits Of High Cholesterol


In cat 9 The benefit of High Cholesterol - Is hyper cholesterolemia a disease? an interesting hypothesise is to be found.

I am a great believer in nutrition now, giving the body the tools to help heal itself. After my MI the hardest part was to be honest with oneself in what caused this preventable disease - for me diet and smoking and the supermarket is out to kill you with invisible bullets round every aisle. I'm a tad disgusted with the thought that the alternative therapy industry have adopted the same line as pharma in promoting designer products to lower cholesterol when it appears to me that neither know the full mechanisms behind it.


 

 

jknosplr
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#13  Post by jknosplr » Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:41 am

Theodore Joregensen A true American to be sure!

I read his letter and was quite impressed by his resume. He says he retired when he was 70, and wrote the letter at age 97, he passed on at 100years. He never reveals at what age he began the VC protocol only that he began taking it. One may construe that he lived most of his life with cholesterol at 240 + or -. What his letter tells me is
1. Removing sugars and starches lower cholesterol (Johnwen and Bushy)
2. He did not have CVD and what ever his cholesterol ran at made no difference. (again cholesterol is not the issue)
3. He used 5 gr VC/day and was never had a cold. (I have not had one in several years either)
4. When witnessing a nuclear detention, stay way from the flash!

What ever else was in his genetics, diet and or environment seem to shield him from CVD even when exposed to unknown amounts of radiation. Perhaps it was the cod liver oil, or the grass hoppers.

http://www.vitamincfoundation.org/jorgensen.htm

freeform

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#14  Post by freeform » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:10 am

Jk - nice one!

How are you getting on with your Statin? :wink:

jknosplr
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:04 am
Contact:

Re: Niacin- NIASPAN study halted increase in Ischemic stroke.

Post Number:#15  Post by jknosplr » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:37 am

Free
I take them along with 20gr VC and other vits everyday. Have no muscle pain, memory loss, cancer or other side effects that I can blame on them. :shock: At this point one has to diversify a bit and keep the bases covered if this is covering the bases.
stay well


Return to “Heart Disease: Linus Pauling's Vitamin C/Lysine Therapy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests