Page 1 of 1

H2O2 vs. MMS?

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:58 am
by eDOC
Hi there,

1. Are they both similar in there pharmacokinetics & dynamics?

2. Do the med conditions for which they are indicated overlap?

3. Edges of both?

Thanks.

Re: H2O2 vs. MMS?

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 11:46 am
by ofonorow
I went looking for Dr. Hesselink's MMS articles (before asking him.)

http://www.bioredox.mysite.com/CLOXhtml/CLOXilus.htm

http://www.bioredox.mysite.com/CLOXhtml/CLOXhome.htm


and I got those from this link
http://www.healthsalon.org/309/thomas-lee-hesselink-md-writes-on-mms-and-sodium-chlorite/

Here is what I know and it isn't much from speaking with Dr. Hesselink. He prefers chlorite (MMS) over H2O2 because the body has catalyse which immediately neutralizes h2o2. Ergo, any benefit from h2o2 must be from the increased oxygen in the blood. In his opinion, the MMS/Chlorite IV can attack pathogens because it isn't neutralized (although he advises his patients not to take vitamin C on the day of their MMS IVs?!?).

I know at least one individual with Lyme disease (among a myriad of other illness) who credits Hesselink's MMS/Chlorite IVs with saving her life.

Re: H2O2 vs. MMS?

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 3:06 pm
by Johnwen
I don't know about these guys. The FDA has got them in front of a Grand Jury. So they must be doing something to help people or them nasty words, "cure a disease!" They have a forum maybe someone knows the answers to your questions.

http://jimhumble.biz/

Re: H2O2 vs. MMS?

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:56 pm
by eDOC
Thanks Owen for posting the links & your clinical experiences.

How does he administer IV MMS/Chlorite (similar to to H2O2), thought it could only be taken orally?