O
Pages 38 to 54 of complaint filed describes the care of 8 patients given by the Huggins group, I found other instances of the complaint on other web pages as to validate (casewatch aka quackbuster, aka Barrett) postings of same material.
http://www.casewatch.org/board/dent/huggins/alj.pdfThe complaints from the victims are as said 38 to 54, there is no reason to believe this is bogus. The information came from the same site as I read the complaint concerning your case, its that information misconstrued also?? The names of the victims are not published for what ever reason...................privacy perhaps. If it was not true Huggins has had only 9 years to fight it and have it rescinded, and sue for libel.
he negated any validity of his claims by the use of a prop to further his agenda. Perhaps even to make the procedures more intricate and secretive than they actually were for $$$$$$ as usual. There also was other carnival like devices he employed to fleece victims of their $$$$$ while the victims hopelessly longed for a cure.
http://www.casewatch.org/board/dent/huggins/alj.pdfPage 24 line 110 500 questions that have little to do with mercury toxicity,
Why is a licensed dentist practicing ......Medicine? e.g diagnosing Multiple sclerosis????
Page 24 line 116 altering hospital blood tests.
Page 26 line 129 Using hair analysis
Page 29 line 139, 140 sub a,b,c,d the Bubble Operatory (Carnival Prop)
Page 50 line 217 Huggins intimidates and coerces patient
Page 59 line 5 abandonment of patients
page 59,60 Initial decision, expunges your charge of libel against me (apology accepted!!).
I'll stop here, I think you get the point that you already ...were aware of.
Why am i here?.....................I'll give you two answers, Freedom of choice to pursue a cure for a disease who which mainstream on several occasions said there was none. To Educated my self as much as I can to fight the same disease from as many say outside the box, I always say what box!
I learned about Huggins, Alagams and mercury toxicity from this site, I learned about the"amalgam meter" from another site. Point is you chose not to post both sides of the story, it had to be learned else where. You were aware of other information. This type of activity clouds the viable information that is posted concerning VC and other supplements that enhance the health of people. Another words try to post both and let the sick people decide.
I know that you would not condone any unscrupulous activity in any form, on the other hand you continue to maintain "he harmed no one". Harm can be defined in several different forms and you know that. It appears that its being covered up by the alternate medicine camp for what ever reason, perhaps the same reason "Big Pharma" scrubs their chalk board............posturing
You are quick to condemn the use of Statins, pick apart study's to fit your agenda, but not willing to post or a least elude to the positive side of any mainstream study, its always negative. Unless of course its a study on VC or another "placebo" which returns results friendly to your camp.
If this Forum intent is to help people then both sides good or bad, pro and con, aught to be made available. When there is 100% dissemination, the the party disseminating information sits in a better light than one who only publishes one side. If the product is as good as is advertised it will sell its self.
I enjoy this site I get a lot of good information concerning my health and options. I hope you will allow me to continue with my challenges though some may rub you and others wrong, I just want the truth so I may make a informed decision. So as you say to continue the "experiment" on myself with no hidden or unknown data . As stated, I have some skin in the game!
J