"THE JOURNAL IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION: Last Revised 8-04-1997
Copyright (c) 1997 "The Vitamin C Foundation "
1
____________________________________________________________
Most Animals Produce The Equivalent Of 3 to 15 Grams of Vitamin C Every Day |
Vitamin C isn't a vitamin at all. It isn't a
necessary component of diet, at least for all mammals with the exception of guinea pigs,
fruit eating bats, the red vented bulbul bird and primates - which includes us. All other
species make their own.
This they do by converting glucuronic acid derived from glucose into ascorbic acid (C6H8O6). Three enzymes
are required to make this conversion. One of these enzymes, or part of the enzyme system, is missing in
primates. Irwin Stone proposed, in 1965, that a negative mutation may have occurred in these species so as to
lose the ability to produce vitamin C. In primates this is thought to have occurred in the region of 25 million
years ago.
Mutations can and frequently do occur in nature. Only those that put a species at advantage at the time
tend to become dominant. Unfortunately, reversing such mutations is highly unlikely to occur. Unlike other
vitamins, vitamin C is required in large amounts which could only be supplied by a tropical diet high in fruit
and other vegetation. if sufficient vitamin
C could be obtained from such a diet the quantity of glucose normally used to synthesize vitamin C could be
channeled towards energy production. This could conceivably have been an advantage for primates or other
species.
This advantage may have come at a price. Dr. Jungblut, an early pioneer of vitamin C therapy in the 1930's,
discovered that only us primates and guinea pigs were susceptible to scurvy as well as anaphylactic shock,
pulmonary tuberculosis, diptheritic intoxication, a poliomyelitis-like viral infection and a viral form of
leukemia. None of the vitamin C synthesizing laboratory animals had susceptibility to these diseases. This is
perhaps one of the first observations that led to the idea that susceptibility to viral infections could be a
consequence of vitamin C deficiency. Could humanity's history of disease - endemic infections, plagues and
more recently cancer and heart disease - be the result of our inability to produce vitamin C and our inability to
obtain it from the food we eat?
|
|---|
| Goat | 2,280 - 13,300 mg |
|---|---|
| Rat | 2,737 - 13,902 mg |
| Rabbit | 1,547 - 15,820 mg |
| Cow | 1,099 - 1,281 mg |
| Mouse | 2,352 - 19,250 mg |
| Sheep | 1,736 mg |
| Cat | 336 - 2,800 mg |
More than 50% of People Require Over 2,500 mg to Reach Maximum AbsorptionVitamin C is One of the Least Toxic Substances Known to Man |
The fact that almost all species continue to make vitamin C suggests that the amount of vitamin C generally available from diet is not enough for optimum nutrition except in exceptional circumstances such as a tropical environment. The chart above shows the average amount produced by each animal, adjusted to an equivalent body weight for Man. Under normal circumstances the daily amount produced, adjusted for comparison to a 70 kg man, is somewhere between 3,000 mg and 15,000 mg, with an average of 5,400 mg.Species of monkeys, such as the squirrel monkey, require an equivalent of 2,000 mg a day to maintain health and up to 1000 mg a day to maintain blood levels found in the wild. Animals produce variable amounts depending on their circumstances. Under conditions of stress or infection synthesis can easily quadruple. Some primates appear to require up to 2,800 mg a day equivalent to survive the long-term stresses of captivity, while guinea pigs require 3,000 mg per day to recover from anesthesia. What about us? While a mere 60 mg a day can prevent scurvy, the deficiency disease first identified by Dr. James Lind in 1753, it would be illogical to assume that this is the optimal dose. A survey of doctors in the US found that those who were healthiest consumed at least 250 mg of vitamin C per day. A recent survey has shown that a person's vitamin status is a good predictor of their mortality risk. High blood vitamin C levels indicate a low risk for cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer and other immune based diseases. Optimal intakes to reduce risk of such conditions would appear to be at least 500 mg per day. Expensive Urine?But aren't you simply making expensive urine when you take large amounts of supplements? Dr. Michael Colgan investigated this often made rebuttal. He investigated how much vitamin C we use by giving increasing daily doses and measuring excretion. "Only a quarter of our subjects reached their vitamin C maximum at 1,500 mg a day. More than half required over 2,500 mg a day to reach a level where their bodies could use no more. Four subjects did not reach their maximum at 5,000 mg." Increasing vitamin C intake from 50 mg to 500 mg tends to double serum vitamin C levels. Increasing intake to 5,000 mg a day will double serum levels again. Expensive urine? Vitamin C protects the bowel, kidneys and bladder on the way out. As Dr. Michael Colgan points out the average victim of bowel or bladder cancer spends $26,000 for treatment - mostly to no avail.While it is valid to infer from this brief history of evolution, a comparison with other species, and average excretion rates that optimal vitamin C levels are probably above 1,000 mg with plenty of room for individual variation,what about 'hard evidence'? What levels are required to ensure maximum function of enzymes and body systems dependent on vitamin C? A quick review of some of vitamin C's hundreds of biochemical roles will help us here. Vitamin C is required for the synthesis of collagen. Our intercellular glue that keeps skin, lungs, arteries, the digestive tract and all organs intact. It is a potent anti-oxidant protecting against free radicals, pollution, carcinogens, heavy metals, and other toxins. It is strongly anti-viral and mildly anti-bacterial. Energy cannot be made in any cell, brain or muscle without adequate vitamin C. The adrenal glands have a high concentration of vitamin C which is essential for stress hormone synthesis. Vitamin C is so central in so many chemical reactions in the body that,without it, life is simply not possible. Are Western Killer Diseases Symptoms of a Vitamin C Deficiency?The immune system depends on having healthy immune cells and associate molecules such as antibodies. Vitamin C is essential for both. Antibody production increases on supplementing 1 gram of vitamin C. It is also needed for interferon, complement, and prostaglandin production, and is essential for the proper function of immune cells such as lymphocytes and leukocytes. A recent study showed, in the test tube, that vitamin C can even inactivate the HIV virus.Thanks to the work of Linus Pauling and coworkers we know that 10 grams of vitamin C doubles the life expectancy of cancer patients, and, in some cases effects a complete cure. Its role is even more pivotal in cardiovascular disease, which is now being postulated as the long-term consequence of vitamin C deficiency. Just about every marker of cardiovascular disease, arterial damage, high blood cholesterol levels, low HDL levels, high levels of oxidized cholesterol, thick blood are all improved by adequate vitamin C intake at levels up to 10 grams a day. Vitamin C increases resistance to stress, lessens allergic reactions, helps arthritic conditions, slows down the aging process and improves energy production. Beneficial effects of vitamin C in human trials tend to increase with the amount given up to, and above, 10 grams per day. On the basis of research into vitamin C's effect on disease states it would appear that an intake of somewhere between 1 and 10 grams may be optimal simply for maintaining optimal function of the immune, endocrine and cardiovascular system. How Much Is Too Much?Dr. Robert Cathcart believes the ideal intake for any individual is the highest level they can tolerate without loose bowels. On the basis of his experience with 11,000 patients over 14 years this bowel tolerance level may be 10 to 15 grams in a healthy person, 30 to 60 grams in a person with a cold, and over 199 grams per day in a person with a serious infectious illness. During an infectious illness the best clinical results have been achieved by maintaining high vitamin C levels in the blood through 3 or more grams every four hours.Fortunately, vitamin C is one of the least toxic substances known to man. Four studies gave 10 grams of vitamin C to over 3000 patients without a single reported incidence of toxicity. Other than the bowels there has not been one single case of toxicity resulting from taking vitamin C supplements, despite unfounded reports of potential risk for kidney stones, raising blood uric acid levels, or 'rebound' scurvy. It is unlikely that any vitamin has been tested to such an extent for toxicity and it is safe to assume that supplemental levels of at least 10 grams a day, or up to bowel tolerance, are completely safe. WHAT IS OPTIMUMWhichever way you look at it the figures come out in the same ballpark. The optimum intake is likely to be in the region of 1,000 mg (1 gram) to 10,000 mg (10 grams) per day, If you are in the grips of cardiovascular disease, an infectious or immune system disease, or cancer the ideal level may be much higher. If you drink excessive amounts of alcohol, live in a polluted city, have a stressful lifestyle, take drugs including aspirin, or smoke, your optimal intake will again be raised. An intake of 200 to 300 mg of vitamin C per day is required to raise the average smoker's vitamin C level to that of a non-smoker. An intake of around 50 mg per cigarette probably affords maximum protection.Albert Szent Gyorgi, who isolated vitamin C in 1928, recommends 1 gram daily. Dr. Michael Colgan takes 5 grams daily. Dr. Linus Pauling takes 10 to 18 grams daily. I take 5 grams daily on top of a diet rich in food sources of vitamin C. The choice is yours. |
|---|
"THE JOURNAL IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Copyright (c) 1997 "The Vitamin C Foundation "
Against Disease
____________________________
FROM FISHES TO MAMMALS
By Irwin Stone
2
_____________________________________________________________
| Coming in the next issue: OUR ANCESTRAL PRIMATE |
If we reset the dials in our Time Machine and
travel to a point about 450 million years ago, we may be able
to witness the start of another notable experiment by Nature.
In the seas are the beginnings of the vertebrates, a long line
of animals that will eventually evolve into the mammals and man.
These are the animals with a more or less rigid backbone, containing
the start of a well-organized and complex nervous and muscular
system, and capable of reacting much more efficiently to their
environment than the swarms of simpler, spineless invertebrates,
which had apparently reached the end of their evolutionary rope.
Nature was ready to embark on another revolutionary, and more
complicated, experiment.
Because of the increased complexity of their
nervous system and a fast-acting muscular system, these primitive
vertebrate fishes were able to gather food better and avoid enemies
and other perils, all of which had increased survival value. Before
they could do this, however, they had to develop complex, specialized
organ systems in which various biochemical processes were carried
out. And their requirements for ascorbic acid were undoubtedly
much higher because of their much increased activity. The simpler
structures of the invertebrates no longer sufficed and required
much modification to suit the needs of these more active and alert
upstarts, the vertebrates.
The vertebrate fishes were such a successful
evolutionary experiment that for the next 100 million years or
so they dominated the waters. Nature was now ready to carry out
another experiment -- that of taking the animals out of the crowded
seas and putting them on dry land. It had experience in this sort
of operation since the plants had long ago left the seas and were
well established on land. The land was no longer a place of barren
fields, but was covered with dense vegetation. Two lines of modification
were tried: in one, the fish was structurally modified so that
it could clumsily exist out of the water; in the other, a more
complete renovation job was done. Modifications of the fins and
the swim bladder ended in the evolutionary blind alley of the
lung fishes, but the more ambitious program -- involving a complete
change in the biochemistry and life cycle -- produced a more successful
line -- the amphibians. These creatures are born in the water
and spend their early life there and then they metamorphose into
land-living forms. Frogs and salamanders are present-day denizens
of this group. The next step in evolution was to produce wholly
land-living animals -- the reptiles. These were scaly animals
that slithered, crawled, walked, or ran; and some grew to prodigious
size. Some preferred swimming and reverted to the water and others
took to the air. It was these airborne species that eventually
evolved into the warm-blooded birds. The birds are of particular
interest to us because they solved an ascorbic acid problem in
the same fashion as the primitive mammals, which were appearing
on the scene at about this time.
We have gone into this cursory sketch of this
period of evolutionary history to trace the possible history of
ascorbic acid in these ancient animals. If we assume that the
present-day representatives of the amphibians, the reptiles, the
birds, and the mammals have the same biochemical systems as their
remote ancestors, then we can do some more detective work on our
elusive molecule. These complex vertebrates all have well-defined
organ systems that are assigned certain definite functions. Usually
an organ has a main biological function and also many other accessory,
but no less important, biochemical responsibilities. The kidney,
whose main function is that of selective filtration and excretion,
is also the repository of enzyme systems for the production of
vitally important chemicals needed by the body. The liver,
the largest organ of the body, functions mainly to neutralize
poisons, produce bile, and act as a storage depot for carbohydrate
reserves; but it also has many other duties to perform.
In examining present-day creatures we find
that in the fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, the place where
ascorbic acid is produced in the body is localized in the kidney.
When we investigate the higher vertebrates, the mammals, we find
that the liver is the production site and the kidneys are inactive.
Apparently, during the course of evolution the production of enzymes
for the synthesis of ascorbic acid was shifted from the small,
biochemically crowded kidneys to the more ample space of the liver.
This shift was the evolutionary response to the needs of the more
highly developed species for greater supplies of this vital substance.
The birds are of particular interest because
they illustrate this transition. In the older orders of the birds,
such as the chickens, pigeons, and owls, the enzymes for synthesizing
ascorbic acid are in the kidneys. In the more recently evolved
species, such as the mynas and song birds, both the kidneys and
the liver are sites of synthesis; and in other species only the
liver is active and the kidneys are no longer involved in the
manufacture of ascorbic acid. Thus we have a panoramic picture
of this evolutionary change in the birds, where the process has
been "frozen" in their physiology for millions of years.
This evolutionary shift from the kidneys to
the liver took place at a time when temperature regulatory mechanisms
were evolving and warm-blooded animals were developing from the
previous cold-blooded vertebrates. In the cold-blooded amphibians
and reptiles, the amounts of ascorbic acid that were produced
in their small kidneys sufficed for their needs. However, as soon
as temperature regulatory means were evolved -- producing the
highly active, warm-blooded mammals -- the biochemically crowded
kidneys could no longer supply ascorbic acid in ample quantities.
Both the birds and the mammals, the two concurrently evolving
lines of vertebrates, independently arrived at the same solution
to their physiological problem: the shift to the liver. |
|---|
3
____________________________________________________________
"THE JOURNAL IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Copyright (c) 1997 "The Vitamin C Foundation "
Significance of High Daily Intake of Ascorbic Acid in Preventive MedicineBy Frederick Robert Klenner |
|
|---|
Original version: Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Spring, 1974.
The killing power of ascorbic acid on virus bodies has been demonstrated by me in hundreds of cases, many of which were treated in our hospital with nothing but vitamin C. We have published some 28 papers on this matter. |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
In a paper
titled "An Insidious Virus," [5] I reasoned that it
should be a maxim of medicine for large doses of vitamin
C to be given in all pathological conditions while the physician
ponders his diagnosis. The wisdom of this dictum is backed by
many hundreds of cases under our supervision.
|
THE CHOLESTEROL STORY
|
|---|
The potential [of vitamin C] is so great and the employment so elementary that only the illiterate will continue to deny its use. |
OTHER APPLICATIONS
|
|---|
I would like to quote Herbert Spencer,
who summed up rather well a caution I would like all of us to
take to heart: "There is a principle which is a bar against
all information, which is proof against all argument, and which
cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance. That principle
is condemnation without investigation." SUMMARY
|
|---|
1. Pauling, L. Vitamin C and the Common Cold. San Franciso: V.F. Freeman & Co., 1970.
2. Brody. H.D.: J. Amer. Diet Assn., 29:588, 1953.
3. Klenner. F.R., Virus pneumonia and its treatment with vitamin C. Southern Medical Surgery., Feb. 1948.
4. Klenner, F. R., Encephalitis as a sequelae of the pneumonias. Tri-State Medical J., Feb. 1960.
5. Klenner, F,R. An insidious virus. Tri-State Med. J.June 1957.
6. Lerner, M. et al: Detecting herpes encephalitis earlier. Med World News, May 26, 1972.
7. Stephens, J.C. and Cook, M. Cases of the hidden herpes virus. Med. World News, Feb. 25, 1972.
8. Goodpasture, E.W. Case of the hidden herpes virus. Med. World News, Feb. 25, 1972.
9. Roizmen, B. et al: Tracing herpes viruses, Med. World News, Oct. 1, 1971.
10. Klenner, F.R. A new office procedure for the determination of plasma levels for ascorbic acid. Tri-State Med. J., 5, 1956
11. McCall, C.E. and Copper, R.: Vitamin C shows promise as a bactericidal agent. Bowman Grey School Med. Med. Alumni News 14:1, Feb., 1972.
12. Klenner, F.R. The treatment of trichinosis with massive dose of vitamin C and para-aminobenzoic acid. Tri-State Med. J. 1952.
13. Wintroble, M.M.- Clinical Hematology. Text Books. Lea@ Febiger, 3rd Edition, 1952.
14. Nossal, G.: Most killed vaccines in use termed not fit for mouse. Medical Tribune, April 5, 1972.
15. Ginter, E.: The Role of Ascorbic Acid In Cholesterol Metabolism. Research Institute of Human Nutrition, Bratslo@1970
16. Klenner, F.R.: Massive doses of vitamin C and the viral diseases. Southern Med. Surg., 1951.
17. Ginter, E.: Cholesterol and vitamin C. Amer J. Clin. Nutrition, 24:1238-1245, 1971.
18. Mjasnikove, I.A.: 0 vlijaniji vodorastvorimych vitamnos nekororyje storony obmena vescesty. Tr. Vojennonor Medicinsk. akadeiniji Leningr., 8:140-148. 1947.
19. Tjapina, L.A.: Vlijanie askorbovoj kisloty na cholesterol miju pri giper toniceskoj bolezni i ateroskleroze. Gipe niceskaja bolezn.. Tr. AMN SSSR, 2:108-113, 1952.
20. Spittle. C.: Atherosclerosis and vitamin C. Lancet, @1281. 1971.
21. Ginter, E.: Effects of dietary cholesterol on vitamin C metabolism in laboratory animals. Acta Med. Acad. Hung., 27:23-29, 1970.
22. Ginter, E., Kajabal, I. and Nizner, O.: The effects of ascorbic acid on cholestrolemia in healthy with seasonal deficit of vitamin C. Nutr. Metabol. , 12:76-86, 1970.
23. Ginter, E., Bilisics, 1. and Cerven. J. Cholesterol metabolism under conditions of acute and chronic vitamin C deficiency in guinea pigs. Phsiol. Bohemoslov., 14:466-471. 1965.
24. Small, D.: ,Med. World News, March 30, 1971.
25. Willis, G.C.: An experimental study of the intima ground substance in atherosclerosis. Canad, Med. Assoc. J.. 69:17@ 1953.
26. Willis, G.C.: The Reversibility of Atherosclerosis, Canad. Med. Assn. J., 77:106-109, 1957.
27. Duguid, J.B.: Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, Lancet, 2:@ 1957.
28. Shafer, C.F.: Ascorbic acid and atherosclerosis, Amer. Jour. Clin. Nutr., 23:27, 1970.
29. Stamler. J.:Comprehensive Treatment of Essential Hypertensive Diseases. Monograph on Hypertension, Merck, S@ and Hohme.
30. Asahina and Asano: Prevention, July 1972 pp. 81-82.
31. Mokranjac, M., Petrovic, C. Report on Mercury studies with guinea pigs in relation to amounts of vitamin C administered, C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris.
32. Dannenburg, A.M. et al: Ascorbic acid in the treatment of chronic lead poisoning. JAMA. 114: 1439-1440, 1940.
33. Klenner, F.R.: The role of Ascorbic Acid in Therap@, Tri-Stat. Med. J.. Nov. 1955.
34. Anderson, E.W. et al: Carbon Monoxide Linked to a @ disease. JAMA . 22:5, July 1972.
35. Pelletier, O.: Experiments with Smokers and Non-Smokers, JAMA, April 1969.
36. Mayers, B.W., Where there's Smoke there may be carbon monoxide, Med. World News, Jan 21, 1972.
37. Chambers R. and Pollock, H. J.General Physiol., 10:739@
38. Hellne, G. and Helene, W. EB virus in the etiology of infectious mononucleosis. Hosp. Practice, July 1970.
39 Niderman, J C.: College finding tie mono to EB virus. World News, Dec. 1968.
40. Schlegel, G. E., et. al. The role of ascorbic acid in the prevention of bladder tumor formation. Trans. Amer. Assn. Genitourin Surg., 61, 1969.
41. Rous. S.: Urethritis in men, N. Y. Soc. Med., . Dec. 15, 1971.
42. Klenner, F.L. Observations on the dose and administration of ascorbic acid when employed beyond the range of a vitamin in human pathology. J. Appl. Nutr. 23:3-4, 1971.
43. Leuchtenberger. C. and Leuchtenberger, R.: New dangers seen in marijuana. Nature, Nov. 1971.
44. Campbell, A.M. G. et. all Significant brain damage caused by smoking marijuana, Lancet, Dec. 1971.
45. Virno, M. et. al. Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat Monthly, Dec 196@.
46. Hoffer, A. Use of Ascorbic acid with @ in schizophrenia. Canad. Med. J. , Nov 6 19@
47. Hawkins, D. Back to health the megavitamin way, Med World news, Sep 14, 19@.
48. Klenner,F. R., Recent discoveries in the treatment of lockjaw with vitamin C and Tolserol. Tri-State Med J. July 1954.
49. Abrams, E. and Sandson, J.: .Ann. Rheum. Dis. 27. 1964
50. McCormick, W.J.: Intervertable Disc Pathology: A new etiologic concept, Arch. Pre., 71: 29, 1954.
51. Grccnwood, J.: Optimum vitamin C intake as a factor in the preservation of disk integrity. Med. Ann. D.C.. 33:6. June 1964.
52. Massell, B. E. Warren, J. E, Patterson, P. R. et. al., Antitheumatic activity of ascorbic acid in large doses. New Eng. J. Med., 1950.
53. Klenner, F. R., Case history cure of a 4 year old child bitten by a mature Hiland moccasin with vitamin C. Tri-State Med J. July, 1954.
54. Klenner, F. R., Case history: the black widow
spider. Tri-State Med J., Dec 19@1.
CONTENTS
Related Articles on the Web
4
____________________________________________________________
"THE JOURNAL IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Copyright (c) 1997 "The Vitamin C Foundation "
Vitamin C and the Treatment of Cancer
Reprinted with Permission from The Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients |
Why Review the Scientific Literature?Proper basic nutrition is an essential foundation for health, but there's a growing awareness that it's not enough. One has only to consider the high disease rates in our society - infectious diseases are now the third largest killer in the US as well as the first in the world, and our rates of cancer, arthritis, and mental illness are not abating - to realize that we have to go beyond basic nutrition in combating disease. It's time to look at supplemental nutrients in a serious light, in order to better understand their role in helping our natural immune defenses prevent disease, and in altering the course of disease as well. People talk about orthodox medicine and alternative medicine as if there's a great divide between the two, but there's really no need for such a dichotomy. The bottom line in healing and in maintaining health is really the question, What works? and we should feel free to ask it in evaluating the offerings of both realms, and to combine the best of both. After all, the evidence that something works - not the label you give it - is the important factor in evaluating whether a given treatment, or mode of prevention, is of value. Following is a review of the scientific literature as it pertains to the impact of vitamin C on cancer. The questions, What works? and How might it be applied? were the motivational ones behind this review. As this one does, each review will include only well-designed studies from peer-reviewed journals. Original journal citations are given, along with capsule descriptions of the original scientific abstracts.
In other words, what follows is not anecdotal evidence; it is
scientific evidence. We can now move beyond the stage of allowing
quackbusters, apologists for special interest groups, and other
adherents of the flat-earth school of intellectual inquiry to
maintain that there's no evidence of the disease-fighting value
of nutrients. Because, quite simply, there is, and here it is.
Correspondence: Gary Null, PhD P.O. Box 918 Planetarium Station New York, New York 10024 USA
212-799-1246 Reprinted with Permission from The Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients |
|---|